It is easy when one is winning tournaments to be gracious and kind, and then very one thinks you are a gentleman.but when one has lost - as I knew he would - the real Federer is exposed for all the world to see.
Federer said he lost because the light was bad - not because he came upon a better player than himself. Any one can see that Federer was out played from start to finish. The match had no right going to five sets. The only reason it did was because Federer had over thirty aces which is what I consider cheap points.
If there were no tiebreaks the match would have been over in three set. I am sure Federer noticed that Nadal out rallied him over and over again. That is a clear indication that one is playing a superior player.
I am glad Nadal has won his first Wimbledon title. My third son would be glad also If he were here Nadal is his favorite player, he would be so disappointed to have missed the match.
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
